View Single Post
Old 18-02-2007, 21:55   #36
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Variety.Com: VM have Sky 'rattled'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gavin View Post

Depends on what you mean 'concerned'. A company is always 'concerned' with the competition, but are Sky anymore concerned now than before the merger? I don't think so. If I was Murdoch, I wouldn't be either.

The difference being that before, Sky would not have have spent hundreds of millions buying an ISP. They would not have spent hundreds of millions buying shares in ITV, despite the fact they are specifically forbidden from owning 100% of any terrestrial channel.

I've also noticed in the last few months (since NTL started talking about the merger), Sky have been advertising more and more. Then, we come to their adverts. Sorry, "Editorial Comments" being broadcast regulalarly asking Virgin (or, as they put it, Virgin:NTL) customers to phone and complain if the channels are taken off air.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote