View Single Post
Old 18-02-2007, 13:57   #31
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Variety.Com: VM have Sky 'rattled'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So Gavin, having called the company ntl-Virgin (where have I heard that before?)
I never "called the company ntl-Virgin", I said "ntl-Virgin merger", not company. In the same way I am not a VM puppet, I am not a Sky one either.

Quote:
Going back to VM's (then ntl:Telewest) attempted purchase of ITV, Murdoch junior came out fighting saying they (Sky) had not interest in the proposed by-out, and yet days later they pumped a massive amont of cash into a 17% stake in the company, which ended VM's interest.
Ian Hislop summed it up all nicely for me. When Branson was slagging off Murdoch, Hislop said: Branson is angry because Murdoch is doing a better job of being Branson than Branson is. Basically, Branson is Murdoch with a clever marketting ploy to be hip and cool.

Quote:
I'm not saying he's loosing sleep, but even you have to admit they are concerned?
Depends on what you mean 'concerned'. A company is always 'concerned' with the competition, but are Sky anymore concerned now than before the merger? I don't think so. If I was Murdoch, I wouldn't be either.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote