Quote:
Originally Posted by Downloads
heh You obviously aren't seeing everything else the media and public are seeing then. They are starting objecting about a package of Sports which undercut them, buying a stake in ITV so Virgin couldn't, demanding customers call Virgin to let them know how much Virgin customers want Sky channels and they are so completely not worried about Virgin that they didn't buy any advertising on the day Virgin said they were going to launch. Yeh right 
If you think Sky aren't in the least bit worried about Virgin, i'd love to know your ideas on why they did all this, as surely someone who isn't worried would concentrate on spending their money on improving their own services instead?????
Whether anything changes or not is a different matter, but they are concerned. |
Everything you've described is just the simple ins-and-outs of business. I really don't think think Murdoch's lying in bed awake a night at the thought the ntl-Virgin merger. For one thing you certainly don't get into a position like Murdoch, by being phased at every turn the competition makes.
---------- Post added at 14:44 ---------- Previous post was at 14:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Yes and some, moderators included, are simply writing off the re-brand. I've seen significant changes over the past few months, not just since VM launch day. I'm all for pointing out the continued errors being made, but I genuinely believe they should be given credit where it is deserved.
|
Cable Forum is entirely independent of Virgin Media, as they are of Sky. Moderators are entitled to air their views (providing the don't contradict the terms and conditions of the site), without being Virgin Media public relations mouthpieces.