View Single Post
Old 16-02-2007, 18:38   #48
savvychels
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dorset
Services: VIP120 w/ TiVo x2
Posts: 639
savvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpacksavvychels has a very nice sixpack
Re: Virgin Media more expensive than Sky

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostandconfused View Post
TBH i dont think anyone is going to agree on this one, for some people depending on how many people they live with, what they like to watch, etc sky could well be cheaper, but then someone in a different situation wanting different things VM will be cheaper.

i dont think you can really compare packages as neither offer exactly the same packages, theres enough info on here and other sites that you can make your own mind up which is best for you rather than arguing that sky or VM is best/cheapest?
exactly!! It's what works out best for you and your situation. For me I think the new deals are great, and I HATE having a satellite on my house. I actually do - it's a 15yo one that was already attached when we bought it and I have to get it removed as I hate it with a passion, so I prefer cable if I'm in a cabled area.

Definitely - at the end of the day it's not necessarily about which is cheaper - it's about which has a package/price combination that works best for each individual.
savvychels is offline   Reply With Quote