Thread: Virgin Media more expensive than Sky
View Single Post
Old 15-02-2007, 12:03   #7
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Virgin Media more expensive than Sky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zee View Post
So with SKy you can get 6 mixes, basicly all the most watched TV channels (139 channels), Phone, plus 8Mbps broadband (where as im able to get 7Mbps according to BT) for £26 + £11 BT line rental (which i already pay) is £37 per month.
With Virgin, you get XL package (with 160 channels) Landline & 4Mbps broadband for £62 per month, including line rental.
Sky's phone has no contract either.
So basicly putting it, you get more with Sky for cheaper...

Sky: £37
Virgin: £62
At least compare like with like. The v+ Offers HD, so you should compare it with the Sky+ HD box, which adds an extra £10 a month.

Not forgetting the fact that if you don't have a Sky + HD box, then that's £300 up front..
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote