View Single Post
Old 11-02-2007, 19:48   #17
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Bt Is Cheaper!!! Why Is Ntl Expensive Now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freakfunk View Post
Im not having a BT are morally better than ntl lol, who cares who paid for what, the point is BT have offered me 8meg for £10 a month for a year before going to 14.99. at the moment im paying £35 for dodgy 10meg cable????? I mean if you can't see the attraction of that,? NTL was always traditionally cheaper, but whats happeneing?

---------- Post added at 10:26 ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 ----------

Also i think everyone knows ADSL doesn't vary the speed the same as cable, as the amount of users on the network doesnt vary the speed? Are you aware of that? Thast what im getting at, either way its 8meg for 1/3 of the price

First, as you have been told, it's up to 8 meg. ADSL can be as dodgy as cable.

Second, the tarif you quoted has a very low cap (8 gig per month). Virgin is unlimited (well, apart from traffic shaping, but it's possible BT do that to).
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote