Quote:
|
It was important that this trail especially suffered as little interference from outside Iraqi
|
Er, we did interfere. Rather a lot. Saddam, up until just before he swung, was in US military custody at a US base, not Iraqi custody (for good reasons, if Shias had been holding him, he'd be on the end of a rope in minutes, ditto for Kurds, if Sunnis, he'd have been sprung sooner or later). The court was set up outside the Iraqi court system (it's a 'special tribunal'). Prosecution lawyers and witnesses were given protection by US-led forces, the defence wasn't, resulting in three murders and finally US advisors were installed to advise the judges, who of course got replaced a few times by direct political appointment from the Iraqi government that depends on us for its survival and included at least one who was directly connected to Saddam's victims, which would disqualify him in a proper legal system. It wouldn't have been any more of a kangaroo court if Skippy had been doing the shorthand.
Fair trial? Nope. Iraqi court? Nope. Justice? Nope. Anyone would think that we had something in our past connections to Hussein we wanted to keep out of the public eye.