Cable Forum - View Single Post

Mr Angry · 01-01-2007, 13:38

You're scraping new depths.

You selectively edited my post to omit the highlighted part below.

"My thoughts are with the widows, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters of the servicemen and women who have lost their lives in exchange for a 30 second clip of morbid sensationalism being streamed around the world. I'm sure it's no comfort, whatsoever, for them - particularly at this time of year."

You'd do well to remember that these men and women went to war in the belief that their mission was to remove Saddam Hussein from power, which they did. I also pointed out that British, American and coalition losses post the achievement of the original stated objective were almost entitrely avoidable save for the fact that the US was hell bent on occupation - not something mentioned in Blairs speech of March 20th - which I also quoted.

You might be happy twisting your interpretation of what I wrote to satisfy some perverse playground argument you cannot concede defeat on but I'll certainly not be apologizing to you or any of your war fantasist ilk for sentiments which I know for a fact are foremost in the minds of many grieving widows, widowers, parents and children given that the two main protagonists who sent these people to their deaths can barely muster anything beyond a preprepared press release or soundbite - such is their evident urgency to find a way out of a quagmire created by their nefarious lies and deceit.

Whilst I very much doubt that the vast majority of posters and viewers of these forae share the same poor interperative grasp of the english language and expressions thereof as yourself I will state, unequivocally, that if there are posters on this forum who genuinely feel that I have cheapened the loss of their loved ones lives by stating a fact then they are welcome to come forward or pm me and I'll afford them an apology.

As for your other "points". I have provided the facts (and indeed the Order) in black and white whereas you insist on postulating your ill informed opinion on this matter as some sort of factual analysis to the point that you scurry around to find links which actually undermine your own "argument".

Give it a rest son, your strawman attempts are pathetic, as indeed are your attempts to use these deaths as some sort of moral high ground bargaining chip in an argument with me. This argument, unlike Iraq, is over.

01-01-2007, 13:38	#354
Mr Angry Inactive Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Belfast Posts: 4,785	Re: Update: Saddam Hussein Executed You're scraping new depths. You selectively edited my post to omit the highlighted part below. "My thoughts are with the widows, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters of the servicemen and women who have lost their lives in exchange for a 30 second clip of morbid sensationalism being streamed around the world. I'm sure it's no comfort, whatsoever, for them - particularly at this time of year." You'd do well to remember that these men and women went to war in the belief that their mission was to remove Saddam Hussein from power, which they did. I also pointed out that British, American and coalition losses post the achievement of the original stated objective were almost entitrely avoidable save for the fact that the US was hell bent on occupation - not something mentioned in Blairs speech of March 20th - which I also quoted. You might be happy twisting your interpretation of what I wrote to satisfy some perverse playground argument you cannot concede defeat on but I'll certainly not be apologizing to you or any of your war fantasist ilk for sentiments which I know for a fact are foremost in the minds of many grieving widows, widowers, parents and children given that the two main protagonists who sent these people to their deaths can barely muster anything beyond a preprepared press release or soundbite - such is their evident urgency to find a way out of a quagmire created by their nefarious lies and deceit. Whilst I very much doubt that the vast majority of posters and viewers of these forae share the same poor interperative grasp of the english language and expressions thereof as yourself I will state, unequivocally, that if there are posters on this forum who genuinely feel that I have cheapened the loss of their loved ones lives by stating a fact then they are welcome to come forward or pm me and I'll afford them an apology. As for your other "points". I have provided the facts (and indeed the Order) in black and white whereas you insist on postulating your ill informed opinion on this matter as some sort of factual analysis to the point that you scurry around to find links which actually undermine your own "argument". Give it a rest son, your strawman attempts are pathetic, as indeed are your attempts to use these deaths as some sort of moral high ground bargaining chip in an argument with me. This argument, unlike Iraq, is over.