Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
It was still the law at the time, sorry Mr Angry, but no matter how you like to paint it, it was created under Iraqi law, it was extended under Iraqi law, and it's still under Iraqi law.
I'm sure you'd prefer that US soldiers were tied up in trumped up court cases by corrupt members of the Iraqi police force, and hung just like Saddam, after all, you've made no attempt to hide what value you place on the lives lost over there.
Personally, in such a risky enviroment, I'd give every coalition worker the same protection.
Here you are on one hand saying that the Iraqi law wasn't valid enough to have this order, yet on the other you'd have that same "invalid" law used against coalition forces.
---------- Post added at 12:00 ---------- Previous post was at 11:59 ----------
You're aware of coalition forces being active in Iraq, but do you know exactly where they are?
See the difference between being aware of something, and knowing all the details.
|
Thanks
, so, if you are saying or infering that where there is a lack of intelligence, as to where the insurgents are exactly, " lets take the work out of it and drop some bombs in that area, there are some in there, some civilians too, but hey thats not our worry, we are out for a better tomorrow "
Still doesnt answer the hypocrisy of the whole thing.