Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Read it, do you see any Iraqi signatures on it?
|
I'll take your avoidance of the question as a yes.
---------- Post added at 10:15 ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
You know what? I could agree with your post if it would " protect even more in the future", because it will not!
|
I think you'll find that the proposed victims of the prevented suicide bombers and their offspring would beg to differ, as an example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Regardless what is happening on the ground, is it right to oppose execution on humanitarian grounds yet approve mass killings and woundings of innocents?
If you are saying you can have both then that is your opinion, youre quite entitled to it, but you can only, in my book anyway, have one thing or the other, if hypocrisy is not to be seen to be playing a part.
|
The only issue I have with the death penalty being used in general circumstances is that guilt cannot be guarenteed 100% of the time.
So as a mass punishment, I am against it.
Taking a single case in exceptional circumstances such as Saddams, I see no benefit in keeping him alive.