Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
I will rephrase my question - do you believe that Bush/Blair, or any of the Coalition commanders, have directly ordered the killing of innocent civilians?
Or is it more likely that there have been civilians killed in cross-fire, by accident, by other Iraqis, and sometimes (imho, rarely) on purpose by troops who have been under unrelenting pressure and "lost it"? None of which lessens the death and suffering of the Iraqi civilians who have been killed or injured, but I find it hard to countenance that British troops would willingly breach the Geneva Convention.
|
No need to " rephrase " your question THANKYOU!
The commanders HAVE ordered bombings of areas populated by innocent civilians, correct?
The fact is that bush and blair have blood on their hands.
The government backed the bombings in Baghdad, that killed and injured countless innocent humans, this is the same government that opposes executions on humanitarian grounds, ( but maybe its ok if youre in miami )
You cannot have both things, in other words you cannot bomb and kill innocent people yet oppose executions on humanitarian grounds, please look up the word hypocrisy.
---------- Post added at 09:28 ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by budwieser
War is War, We have a duty to protect others not so fortunate as ourselves. Did we start Murdering innocents? I don`t think so.
We were not the one`s with the suicide bombers killing innocent women. men and children. Would you not protect your family or stand up for a friend being bullied at school? This is no different apart from the firepower being used to counteract the firepower being used.  |
Please read above.....