Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
Its trial by the press again. As said the case needs to be water tight we will now hear all things about this guy in the press every little aspect of his life will be open to ponder. Problem with that is how could a jury of his peers be impartial.And the fact he hasnt even been charged yet...
|
They may be looking for more evidence and by releasing a name the public "may" provide this information. The question is do you think this is an ethical approach or not