Cable Forum - View Single Post

Mr Angry · 06-12-2006, 20:43

Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:37:58 GMT

1st 512K took 8531 ms = 60 KB/sec, approx 494 Kbps, 0.48 Mbps
2nd 512K took 8156 ms = 62.8 KB/sec, approx 517 Kbps, 0.5 Mbps
3rd 512K took 8500 ms = 60.2 KB/sec, approx 496 Kbps, 0.48 Mbps
4th 512K took 6485 ms = 79 KB/sec, approx 651 Kbps, 0.64 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 540 Kbps, 0.53 Mbps

To repeat this test from the source server click here.

This is my speed test six days after I paid Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£34.99 in advance for 10mb service for the month of December and over three days after my original question via open letter to NTL.

Would anyone at NTL care to show the slightest bit of integrity / interest and offer some sort of explanation as to why I should be expected to put up with this "service"?

06-12-2006, 20:43	#42
Mr Angry Inactive Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Belfast Posts: 4,785	Re: An open letter to NTL. Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:37:58 GMT 1st 512K took 8531 ms = 60 KB/sec, approx 494 Kbps, 0.48 Mbps 2nd 512K took 8156 ms = 62.8 KB/sec, approx 517 Kbps, 0.5 Mbps 3rd 512K took 8500 ms = 60.2 KB/sec, approx 496 Kbps, 0.48 Mbps 4th 512K took 6485 ms = 79 KB/sec, approx 651 Kbps, 0.64 Mbps Overall Average Speed = approx 540 Kbps, 0.53 Mbps To repeat this test from the source server click here. This is my speed test six days after I paid Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£34.99 in advance for 10mb service for the month of December and over three days after my original question via open letter to NTL. Would anyone at NTL care to show the slightest bit of integrity / interest and offer some sort of explanation as to why I should be expected to put up with this "service"?