Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
I don't believe it is about "wanting" non-smoking pubs - it is about reducing health risks, especially to passive smokers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6196910.stm
"Ms Hewitt said the ban would protect everyone from second-hand smoke, while making it easier for smokers to quit.
"The scientific and medical evidence is clear - second-hand smoke kills, causing a range of serious medical conditions including lung cancer, heart disease, and sudden infant death syndrome," she said. "This legislation will help to prevent the unnecessary deaths caused every year from second-hand smoke, and recognises that there is absolutely no safe level of exposure." " |
Which is why I made the point about having adequate smoking rooms*. Smokers *know* what the risks are. If they still wish to smoke, let them. Adequate smoking rooms should prevent non-smokers from passive smoking, and, lets face it, the smokers aren't worried about Active smoking, they aren't going to worry about passive smoking.
Edit:* By "Adequate Smoking rooms", I actually mean adequately ventillated smoking rooms. In the local pubs around me , where they did have smoking rooms, they also had extractor fans that were so strong that there was no chance of the smoke escaping into the non-smoking parts of the pub.