Thread: OJ 'confession'
View Single Post
Old 25-11-2006, 21:15   #10
hatedbythemail
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,337
hatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appeal
hatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appealhatedbythemail has a bronzed appeal
Re: OJ 'confession'

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Not really. Protection against double jeopardy is in the US constitution.
indeed

---------- Post added at 02:06 ---------- Previous post was at 01:45 ----------

Quote:
[Also isn't beyond belief is the Guardian's usual stance of telling what to believe (we should hate Murdoch, in case noone noticed), in what's really a straight forward story, which is supposed to be about Simpson, instead of Murdoch.
not sure i follow you but it was a murdoch imprint whioch was to publish the book, murdoch's fox to broadcast the interviw and murdoch radio franchies to boot - though some refused which may have been the last straw for rupes. the story is then about both oj and murdoch, murdoch having provided a multi-media platform which began with the advance for the book.
hatedbythemail is offline   Reply With Quote