View Single Post
Old 13-11-2006, 16:52   #115
popper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,270
popper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze array
popper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze array
Re: A little inside information by an Employee.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
You're just being silly now.

IF there's about 25 million res line in the UK then we can assume that to replace them will cost approximatly £100 (max) a line based on the fact that they charge between £125 and £175 to install a compmently new line.

25m x £100 = 2500m = 2.5bn.

Now pocket money but far less than BT are spending on 21CN and less than half of Ntls current debt (before they even think about ITV).

Once 21CN is rolled out (2010/11) I can see them spending this sort of money on upgrading the last mile.

It's the only sensible way to do it too, as what's the point in replacing the lines when there isn't anything (other than ADSL2+ which is mainly limited by line length not the age of the line) to plug them into in the exchange.

I can't see it taking 50 to 100 years either, that's just a silly exaggeration. It never took that long for BT to build its current network.
they could also ask the user to pay a % of the cost to , if for instance you pay £50, then they give you something in return
over the year or whatever deal the user might consider a bargin to get far better speeds etc.
popper is offline   Reply With Quote