View Single Post
Old 07-11-2006, 02:11   #6
Chris W
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reading
Age: 41
Services: Virgin Media Broadband Size M
Posts: 6,546
Chris W has a nice shiny star
Chris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to Chris W
Re: The allowance of interactive services on NTL for minors..

ah yes it is ntl's fault that you can't control your child.

special needs or not that is not excuse. babies like buttons, tbat is a well known fact among responsible paretns i know, if you are not in control of your child then how is that ntl's problem?

---------- Post added at 03:11 ---------- Previous post was at 03:09 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace View Post
A pin number requirement for any pay per view program is pretty much essential and not requiring it is simply profiteering. In a situation where a parent isn't able to supervise their children one hundred percent of the time the only recourse is to lock all VOD or get rid of NTL totally. Sounds like NTL being very short-sighted or just plain dumb.
sounds like poor parenting if you ask me. How much porn can a child look at by attacking an unattended laptop? A hell of a lot more than a tv. If you want to look after your children then IMHO you should supervise them properly.
Chris W is offline   Reply With Quote