Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Considering that Hans Blix himself stated that they were being hindered and therefore needed more time, Saddam was in breach of the UN resolution which negated the 91 ceasefire.
Now, back to that list you supplied, if military action was the only way to remove them from power, would you march protesting such action and keep those dictators in power?
---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------
Ah so you believe the situation before and after is pretty much the same, just that saddam isn't in power doing it.
So what exactly are you objecting to if you truly believe that to be the case?
The lack of Saddam in control?
It would appear that you do find the situation of him in charge killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's to be acceptable.
Thank you for answering my question finally.
|
Didn't actually say any of that drivel though did I, you said
So again, the situation in Iraq pre military action, men, women and children killed by death squads
I said is that really any different to what's happening there now, if anything Iraq is now more dangerous since Sadam's downfall. You might like the fact that our actions have led to death and destruction based on lie's and illegal actions I don't.