View Single Post
Old 26-10-2006, 16:07   #10
The Jackal
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,604
The Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appeal
The Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appealThe Jackal has a bronzed appeal
Re: RAID...on Windows XP Pro or Server 2003

Tend to agree with the posts from the boys above.

RAID can be problematic but when/if you get it working properly then it can be absolute sweetness but we're talking RAID5 or more with expensive controller cards.

As I tried to say previously read up on it look at the pros / cons / failures and successes before you commit.

As it goes we have *ALL* had problems with RAID anyone who says otherwise may have not used it in anger or abundance.

My last RAID1 failure was a couple of months back I spent ages a few years back setting up that RAID array so that if it did fail then the secondary config would take over and did it : Like **** did it NO

I had to get my ass down to the datacentre and swap the disks over : grrrrrrrrrrr
Luckily I had no data lost but I made sure I disabled the RAID controller and set up a job to rsync the disks - job - done.

They sync up every 2 hours or so and rsync is so fast it only takes a minute.
(so what if you lose like 2 hours worth of data if something went wrong better that than 2 corrupt disks)

Talking of which I have just rsync'd my lappy over the network and even that only takes like 2 minutes.

Good luck mate and good luck in researching alternative solutions.
The Jackal is offline   Reply With Quote