View Single Post
Old 24-10-2006, 12:58   #20
Wicked_and_Crazy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 5,106
Wicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny star
Wicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny starWicked_and_Crazy has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to Wicked_and_Crazy Send a message via Yahoo to Wicked_and_Crazy
Re: Gadget show £500 PC

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZrByte View Post
Well given the fact that almost every component I have ever owned asside from some IBM hard drives (60GXPs thats right the famous faulty ones) and an old seagate drive I havent had a component fail on me, they are all still running in various incarnations right now.
So considdering the oldest of these machines is an 8 year old IBM Cyrix MII 266 machine with a processor not known for its amazing build quality or longevity is one of those machines still running I'd say that is a pretty good testemony to my previous statement that I have never damaged a component by not observing antistatic precautions.
must be the rubber suit you wear

If static wasnt a concern manufacturers wouldnt go to extreme lengths and cost to protect against it
Wicked_and_Crazy is offline   Reply With Quote