Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
No, you can't compare them directly. However, reducing bandwidth does directly affect the quality of a digital signal. If you compared an uncompressed digital signal with an Analogue signal, most people would say that the digital signal is better. As soon as you compress it, the quality may be better or worse depending on the encoding and bandwidth used.
|
My point exactly!! And you know as well as I do they will compress it to death
---------- Post added at 16:54 ---------- Previous post was at 16:53 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creative
It was only 8MHz on Cable, satellite uses 28MHz or so channels.
I'd also say 7 channels per mux is on the low side.
HD has the capacity to show far greater detail than analogue ever could, if its given enough bitrate. The second generation of encoders are coming out now as well, so pictures will improve.
|
So, How many uncompressed digital channels could you put in a mux?? (just out of interest)