View Single Post
Old 18-10-2006, 11:08   #19
injuneer
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 632
injuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to behold
Re: A little inside information by an Employee.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Womble View Post
Yes the very same Bill. Reasons for my statements are, I have friend who was an SDH planner/manager for BT. He was privvy to meetings between NTL and BT about 21C. "We" are a BT partner in the 21c program, thats why I "believe" BT own/payed for it, plenty of their circuits running over it!!

---------- Post added at 09:32 ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 ----------



I was talking the other day and was led to believe there are two schools of thought, each has their own "Big Boy"
supporting it. The director that came from cable in the states whats HFC, the one that didn't whants Telco
I thought Metnet & 21c are 2 entirely different things?
As for choosing HFC over Telco they are both obsolete technologies. Telco is moving towards IP base technologies.
injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote