Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
ignoring the fact the OP guys first language might not be english, the fact he may have Dyslexia, or any other disability come to that, it appears the question is:
he seems to think or has been given the impression that the original website/advertising stated:
"it said at no extra cost".
|
Yes, I was aware of the OP possibly having a disability, but it wasn't just plain poor spelling but sloppy typos which hadn't been corrected and text speak, which wouldn't be written by someone who's first lanaguage isn't English, somone who is dyslexic, has a disability or has dyspraxia - believe me, I've a close friend who has so can recognise this as not being the case.
Well either way whether I worked for ntl or not or even if I owned a tv or not; on demand - whats that mean to most people? It means you can demand to watch what you want when you want. Now with that kind of flexibility I would expect some kind of cost to be associated with it automatically anyway, its the kind of 'no such thing as a free lunch' way of thinking.
I've snipped the rest of your quote as I can't seem to see where its relevant - it just points to information about vod not about the costs associated with content which is the issue here.