Quote:
Originally Posted by punky
Wow, in one post you have managed to libel thousands of research scientists that might for all you know actually agree with you.
|
well actually it was the royal society which im sure you agree is a most learned body. it is they that are pointing out the highly dubious tactics being employed by exxon and co discredit the overwhelming body of peer reviewed evidence.
Quote:
|
This issue is addressed in State Of Fear. If research money comes from oil companies, then the scientist is automatically corrupt regardless of his reputation or what he actually researches/reports. However, if a scientist is funded from a leftist, pro global-warming agenda based organisation, then automatically you're above reproach, and the sun shines out of your backside.
|
this issue is far too important to be left to people with commercial interests. why would a leftist organisation wish to promote climate change. what really is in it for them? why would you be 'pro-global warming'? whats their agenda? i dont see the payback for them but i do for exxon in discrediting legitimate scientific enquiry with pseudo scientific enquiry, as the royal society, not me, alleges.