View Single Post
Old 13-11-2004, 23:16   #9
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Bank Fraud Compensation

Quote:
Originally Posted by greencreeper
The test is useless - the emails usually do look genuine but if you look at the raw format of the message you'll instantly see they're not. That test doesn't allow you to view the code - they could all be genuine

[edit] I got 60% by random ticking
Quote:
Originally Posted by punky
Just noticed the quiz. I got 80%, but it is hard to tell with pictures. The easiest way to check is by the links in the email.
But if you look at the bottom of the picture it shows you the http of the key link in the message. Probably as much as average joe could be expected to understand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greencreeper
The emails should never be sent in the first place - that's the issue to address, not whether victims should be compensated by the bank or through private claims in the courts. Users are really ignorant of the dangers and facts though - it's frightening.
But if you have moved to an online service, they do need to push information to you (e.g. you have a new statement), that requires emails to be sent.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote