Quote:
|
Originally Posted by etccarmageddon
I dont see how there's any way to accomodate a 5% user section (if) it uses 67% of the resources. Simply because there's no way these people are going to pay around £250 a month for their usage (10 times £25). I think the answer will be a GB charge over the 40GB allowance which will make these people cut down their usage to a more realistic level - obviously if they want to use 240GB a month and are willing to pay say £100 for the extra bit then everyone's happy but it's most likely that the 'over eaters' will cut down their consumption.
|
You exaggerating, I am talking about 50-100gig a month, and a GB charge over 40 gig is not the answer because it would make using say 80gig unaffordable to most people.
I am seeing here low usage users not been prepared to compromise they just happy because they are catered for.
"95% of usersonly browse the internet a couple of hours a day"
ahh an isp's perfect customer someone who doesnt use what they pay for, the way I see this is the isp would be happy with people not using their broadband to its potential and anyone who does use it ie. power users they dont want because they less profitable.
This would do nothing to improve quality of service either you wont suddenly see a better contention ratio or anything like that, if usage went down accross the board capacity would simply be cut or the contention ratio would be increased.