View Single Post
Old 07-11-2004, 23:03   #36
greencreeper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Leeds - the dog house
Age: 49
Services: Email me for a current price list
Posts: 8,270
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
Re: Train crash near Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjmillsnun
EDIT Greencreeper: why would the car be anything but side on to the tracks? If they wanted to push the car or crank it out on the starter (only possible with manuals) they want it pointing the right way.
I was thinking in terms of "what if the vehicle couldn't be moved clear of the tracks", and also for those contemplating suicide it might be better for those on the train if their vehicle isn't side on.
greencreeper is offline   Reply With Quote