View Single Post
Old 31-10-2004, 23:33   #220
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: [Merged] 2004 US Presidential Election

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
I dont think its fair to blame gore

Remember how many people got kkicked off the electoral roles, manily african-americans who overwealming vote Democrate

All of whom had the chance to have their names put back on the electrol role if they wanted to vote.
A lot of counties ignored the list because of the problems and therefore more criminals (who allegedly vote dem) were able to vote when they shouldn't have been.
Using all the main counting techniques the republicans still won in 2004.
You can bitch and moan and cry foul as much as you like but it doesn't change the fact they got more votes.
No I don't like it either, but it's their electoral system, and until they vote to change it, nothing can be done.


The BBC is far from impartial on most of their reporting.
Just look how they depict the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
In the BBC world view, Gazza and the west bank are Palestine, rather than part of Egypt and Jordan.

Or reporting on Iraq, when did the BBC last run positive reports on how it's being rebuilt?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote