Quote:
Originally posted by Graham
No, your original assertion was *wrong*. He was not "done" for, ie charged with, manslaughter, he was "done" for murder. The fact that it was later reduced on appeal doesn't change the nature of the original charge.
|
It dosn't matter what the origional charge was, he was finally found guilty of manslaughter.
Quote:
|
You seemed to be arguing that someone who was known to be mentally ill was a reliable witness.
|
and you are arguing that a career criminal is a reliable witness.
Quote:
|
No, I'm someone who doesn't support the right of *anyone* to take the law into their own hands.
|
Not anyone, just the people who find intruders on their premises.
Quote:
|
"In most cases a quick 'oy! what you doing?' would be enough to establish wether force was necessary." doesn't describe the positions of several people in here (including yourself) who have already publically and for the record(!) stated that they would "hit first and ask questions later"!
|
I never said that I would do that. (I think) Its been a long thread, but it dosn't sound like me
