Thread: Intel blunders again!
View Single Post
Old 16-10-2004, 01:01   #12
Richard M
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 6,343
Richard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze array
Richard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze arrayRichard M has a bronze array
Re: Intel blunders again!
Intel are following AMD these days...AMD introduced the first dual-core chips (and quad-core ) and were the first to use x86-64 architecture.
AMD is quickly becoming the market leader.
Richard M is offline   Reply With Quote