Cable Forum - View Single Post

punky · 09-10-2004, 14:42

Whenever Bush is involved there are always conspiracy theories around. Let's face it, in the first debate he was comprehensively beaten by Kerry (it changed a 5 point deficit into a 3 point lead for Kerry), it hardly did him any good.

I saw the second presidential debate. Bush was much better. They were both pretty close, but I think Kerry edged it IMO. Not by much, if any. Seems like Bush learnt his lesson from the first one.

The vice presidential debate was good though. So good that some people seem to think like I do that they should be running for president instead of Bush and Kerry. I thought Edwards was better than Kerry in the nominations anyway, but Kerry only beat him because Edwards lacked experience. Seems like a reasonable enough bloke though.

09-10-2004, 14:42	#150
punky Inactive Join Date: Jun 2003 Age: 45 Posts: 14,750	Re: [Merged] 2004 US Presidential Election Whenever Bush is involved there are always conspiracy theories around. Let's face it, in the first debate he was comprehensively beaten by Kerry (it changed a 5 point deficit into a 3 point lead for Kerry), it hardly did him any good. I saw the second presidential debate. Bush was much better. They were both pretty close, but I think Kerry edged it IMO. Not by much, if any. Seems like Bush learnt his lesson from the first one. The vice presidential debate was good though. So good that some people seem to think like I do that they should be running for president instead of Bush and Kerry. I thought Edwards was better than Kerry in the nominations anyway, but Kerry only beat him because Edwards lacked experience. Seems like a reasonable enough bloke though.