Thread: 3DMark05...
View Single Post
Old 29-09-2004, 20:30   #44
Bifta
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Re: 3DMark05...

5073 for me, that's with the X800 back at stock (pro) speeds, horrible memory and a nasty processor (half of my bits are in a new case) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=7999
Bifta is offline   Reply With Quote