Quote:
Originally Posted by Salu
And what about my choice/right as a non-smoker NOT to breathe in 2nd hand smoke?
|
Hehehe...I'm not
that annoyed! But you do have a choice. Don't go in a pub.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salu
Smoking per se should not be banned as that would then fulfill your point above but I wouldn't call this removing choice so much as creating a law for the good of everyone.
|
Surely that's a little contradictory. If it's for the good of
everyone then smoking should be banned full stop right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salu
My not smoking could not offend or harm the person next to me...but someone smoking next to me would. If the smoker enforces his right/choice to smoke then he will be removing mine, not to. If I don't smoke I will not affect him. The smoking ban would ensure that I could exercise mine. The smoker, however can go outside or pop home etc...
|
As I said, I am in favour of more places that are smoke free, so you could 'pop' to one of those places rather than the nearest smoke-filled emporium. Your choice hasn't been imposed upon at all, as you ultimately have the choice not to go in the pub - which is in effect exactly what you're asking the smokers to do.
BTW you're not an ex-smoker are you Salu?
Quote:
Originally Posted by homealone
So - what happens with a pub that has banned smoking, so everyone who wants to have a fag has to go outside, when they want to have a 'lock in' 
|
Dunno...lock-out maybe?