View Single Post
Old 10-09-2004, 21:56   #43
Matth
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
Matth has reached the bronze age
Matth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze age
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?

From a couple of overclocker sites & forums.

280/366 (or 183, if it reports actual, rather than DDR clock)
275/365

So the overclock achievable is a little less than 10% on the RAM - not surprsing, since it's 6nS RAM which is right on it's 166 (333) clock rating - and no ramsinks, and about 10% on the core, passive heatsinked.

Maybe there might be a little more in the tank, if heroically cooled, but I wouldn't expect much.

Unless you're aiming for records for this particular card, I'd say take an easy overclock, and come inside of those figures, maybe 265 / 350, or don't bother - there isn't enough overclocking reserve to make much difference - unplayable frame rates would still be unplayable, and some of the tests show 0-2% gain from a 10% overclock, others show pretty well the full 10%.
Matth is offline   Reply With Quote