View Single Post
Old 27-07-2003, 01:20   #84
Graham
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramrod
Thats nice, I'm glad you feel able to make split second decisions in the dark, in the middle of nowhere with multiple intruders on the premises.
Do you really think that Tony Martin blasting someone in the back with a shotgun *after* he had already fired several shots and the burglars were running away was a "split second decision"?

Quote:
Everyone has the *same* rights to protection under the law. *Everyone*. Even burglars.

Yes, thats a shame. Bit of an oversight don't you think?
No, not an oversight in the slightest. As I've just said in another message, our laws exist not only to protect us from criminals, but to protect us from ourselves.

I don't want to live in a country where the Lynch Mob deals out "justice" (ie a good kicking), do you? Would you still want to if the person getting the kicking was you because you were just in the wrong place at the wrong time?


Quote:
No we don't. Martin stayed in jail longer because he was deemed to be a "danger to burglars"
Martin was denied parole because he refused to show remorse for what he had done, something which is generally considered to be an important part of a parole hearing.

Quote:
So you want thieving, drug dealing, never worked a day in their lives career **** to have the same rights as people who go about their business lawfully?
Tell me, which Tabloid newspapers do you read?

Quote:
I say you should forfeit some rights when you go about unlawfull business.
And I say we should string them all up from the nearest lamp-post! - Signed Angry of Andover.

Quote:
We pay enough tax already. It is the way that it is spent that is the problem.
So write to your MP. That's what he's there for.


Quote:
Final point: The police are here to protect us. They failed to protect Martin to the point that he had to defend himself.
If you have to break the law to uphold the law there is *NO LAW*.

Quote:
All the police(and I meet a lot of them) that I have spoken to about his case say that the law needs changing and he should never have been locked up.
He didn't *need* to shoot someone in the back, but he did, out of a desire for revenge, nothing else. He broke the law. He paid the penalty.

Quote:
Wake up and smell the coffee...
Wake up and listen to the baying of the Lynch Mobs...
  Reply With Quote