Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
deleting post now 
edit...the link in #1 doesn't work for me...... |
weird - works fine for me....
As to the whole theory...
I saw this not long after 9/11 on a french website, and although interesting, it lacked any substance.
There was no alternate theory offered, nor any motivation for the US Govt blowing up one of their own buildings...
The hole shown is approximately the right size for an engine from a 757.
If, as stated, the plane bounced, then went in, it may well have missed the cable reels, and the momentum would have crried the burning fuel inwards rather than outwards.
The lack of a "bounce mark" on the lawn - hard to say - could have not "bounced" but merely been pulled up sharply as the pilot realised he was too low (pure guesswork, but so is the theory being put forward). Could have bounced where a fire truck parked, after all - they got there before the press did..
also for equality - see
http://www.geocities.com/roboplanes/757.html