Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gazzae
There was a program on ages ago about crash tests. I remember they were doing tests like a train crashing to one of the containers they use to transport nuclear waste. They also had a test where they flew a jumbo into a large strong concrete wall or something similar. The plane completly disintegrated.
|
Well of course it would. Whilst it may be a large structure it is fairly fragile when subjected to stresses that it was not designed for. If you think of an aircraft like an extended vacum cleaner hose (which is pretty much what the main hull looks like) in a frontal impact, the sides of the hull would concetina up and disintegrate.
The hole, with a lack of other information is highly likely to be an engine, where is the other, well all sorts of other structures are in the way, perhaps a concrete lift shaft slowed it.
The fire certainly had more fuel to it than a simple missile could provide perhaps a few thousand tonnes of Jet A. The heat that created would also be sufficient to melt aluminum to finish what was left of the hull.
The fires in the North and South towers were hot enough that the hulls of the two 'craft were not recovered, why are there no conspiracies there?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pierre
<snip>
And by the way, NO I don't think we landed on the moon either.
|
One I remain open on, I do believe the Appollo missions went to the moon, however did they do it in the 60s? This said there were enough people around to track a projectile that hung around in LEO for the duration that this would need to be a conspiracy that involved the russian, Japanes and european space agencies. Being as it was a cold war race against the ruskies, I doubt this.
Though the photograps do leave questions.