Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BBKing
The nose thing (and yes, I know the US authorities mentioned it first, they were stone wrong, too) is a total straw man - if you use your brains you get this:
|
ooh I'll try and use my brains then, just for you Mr Intelligentia.
Theres no denying that.
Quote:
|
2) the nose of an airliner colliding with a solid object is unlikely to be in a fit state to do anything afterwards.
|
Agreed
Quote:
|
3) something must have caused the hole
|
yes, something did. I'm still with you
Quote:
|
3) hang on, there are two energetic circular heavy solid objects hung off 757s travelling at 45 degrees to the outer wall that past accidents have proved take some stopping. To whit, the engines.
|
QED - fantastic.
Why is there only one hole then? if one engine managed to enter several tens of metres why doesn't the other even make a dent?
Why didn't the brilliant minds of the USA government point this out. I'm sure they have expert crash investigators. Maybe you should let them know.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
And I urge you to go back and read the link that I posted and the other comments where all of these points (which are, BTW, simply French re-hashes of American conspiracy sites) are addressed and explained.
|
I have, and it didn't explain it to anything like satisfaction.