Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
OK, so how about a motive for this attack?
Look at the wider context here. On 9/11, we know for a fact that three airliners were hijacked by Islamist extremists. Two crashed into the World Trace Centre, watched by dozens of TV cameras. One crashed in a field, heard by several witnesses who were on the phone with passengers of that plane. A fourth airliner was also hijacked (unless anyone can explain what happened to Flight 77, which is still missing  ) but because there is not the same weight of evidence surrounding it, there is room for the usual suspects to shout 'Government conspiracy!'. It is utterly ridiculous, especially on a day when we already know that three (count 'em) planes had already been hijacked with the intention of crashing them into high-status buildings. |
Well I think the motive has already been established.
and you obviously point out that three (counting 1,2,3 yes 3) other planes were hijacked on the same day etc.
and because of these facts you accept what the US government tell you about what happened to the Pentagon when the evidence puts those turn of events into some doubt at the very least. You're a spin doctors dream.
What happened at the pentagon is worth questioning, and if there is some doubt that what happened there is different to what was told it should be questioned.
There is no doubt the Pentagon was targeted as part of a co-ordinated attack but targeted by what? I don't know.
But just becuase I don't know does not mean I have to accept what US officials are saying.
When the Pentagon was hit everybody immediately though it was by a plane. Two planes had hit the trade centre, one had crashed, what else could it be????
Once it was reported as a plane that's the story that they stuck with. What if what hit the Pentagon was something scary'er. A more sophisticated weapon. A weapon that could penetrate tens of metres of reinforced concrete. Wouldn't it be better to stick with the story of a plane, a credible story that every one would believe rather than admit the Pentagon was a victim of a sophisticated missile attack?
In regards to flight 77. Flight no.s and passenger manifests could easily be created.
When you look at the photographs I do not believe that a plane that has already hit the ground then into the building could make a hole like the one in photographs.
You believe what you want to believe.