View Single Post
Old 06-09-2004, 13:15   #40
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: What did hit the Pentagon?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
OK, so how about a motive for this attack?

Look at the wider context here. On 9/11, we know for a fact that three airliners were hijacked by Islamist extremists. Two crashed into the World Trace Centre, watched by dozens of TV cameras. One crashed in a field, heard by several witnesses who were on the phone with passengers of that plane. A fourth airliner was also hijacked (unless anyone can explain what happened to Flight 77, which is still missing ) but because there is not the same weight of evidence surrounding it, there is room for the usual suspects to shout 'Government conspiracy!'. It is utterly ridiculous, especially on a day when we already know that three (count 'em) planes had already been hijacked with the intention of crashing them into high-status buildings.
Not to mention the fact that it makes absolutely no sense that the government would want to cover up a missile/small jet attack. What are these people thinking? People in the government thinking it would be too embarrassing to admit to a missile attack, so they made up an attack with a large airliner, as this nicely coincided with other events on that day?

What utter rubbish...
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote