View Single Post
Old 26-07-2003, 14:15   #78
Steve H
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Heaven
Age: 39
Services: Freeview, 512k Pipex.
Posts: 1,758
Steve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of QuadsSteve H has a fine set of Quads
Send a message via ICQ to Steve H Send a message via MSN to Steve H Send a message via Yahoo to Steve H
Quote:
Originally posted by Jon T
Another anomally in all of this is that whilst an intruder is in your home, it becomes his workplace under the terms of the Health and Safety at Work Act, so if the burglar injures himself on any hazard in your home(for example being bit by a dog), you can become liable to prosecution under the H & S Laws.

Because of the above statement, it is now a legal requirement to clearly indentify any protective measures employed in the protection of your home(i.e. A dog) that may cause injury to an intruder.

Jon
Again, thats where the Law's wrong. Its pathetic that someone who comes into your home, with intent to damage and steal can still prosecute you, if they hurt themselves whilst commiting these acts.
Steve H is offline   Reply With Quote