Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Russ D
So what happened to the wings of the plane? Why no damage to the building which would point to it being them? I'll accept that they would fold back on themselves but still, that much of metal and fuel would surely leave tell-tale damage to the Pentagon over a wider distance?
|
If the plane hit at virtually ground level, the wings, being mostly light and not designed for that sort of stress, would have left comparitively little "inward" damage, although the wide "bloom" of smoke from the fuel can be clearly seen.
Quote:
|
Why would a plane that size leave a 'tunnel' of damage through the building which is clearly smaller that the diameter of the aircraft?
|
It is the conspiracy theorists who claim that "tunnel" was left by the fuselage, but it's more likely that it was actually an engine (a very solid lump of metal) that actually caused it.
Quote:
|
How did all those tonnes of burning fuel not cause those few windows to disintegrate?
|
The windows are designed to be bomb proof.
Quote:
|
I'm not saying it was anything other than a terrorist attack by plane but there are still a lot of odd unanswered questions.
|
I think most of them are entirely answerable.