View Single Post
Old 29-08-2004, 02:21   #14
Bifta
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Re: Your ultimate game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard M
Excellent ideas so far, I like yours Bifta.
What you have in mind is possible, the only question is: why don't they do it?
FS 2004 only renders a miniscule amount of detail, when you start to up the scenery complexity/density it'll hog even the most powerful machine, it'd probably also take a lifetime to properly map even something the size of a small county let alone the world, and even then, you'd need a machine spec. that we'll probably not see for at least another 5-10 years to render it all.
Bifta is offline   Reply With Quote