View Single Post
Old 18-08-2004, 16:36   #15
Kneebs
Inactive
 
Kneebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sunderland
Age: 48
Posts: 415
Kneebs is just really niceKneebs is just really niceKneebs is just really niceKneebs is just really niceKneebs is just really niceKneebs is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Kneebs
Re: new samsung boxes more trouble then they worth?

Right, I've been doing some testing with uploads / downloads / p2p with the samsung...

When doin no downloads / uploads or no p2p running, pings to www.bbc.co.uk take about 20ms, with no packetloss whatsoever, web pages take about 4-5 seconds to fully load

uploading alone to ntl webspace (at 25-30Kb /s), ping time increases to around 150-200ms, some packet loss (3%), web pages take about 10-15 seconds to fully load.

downloading alone from download.com (at about 110Kb/s), ping times jump to about 150ms, no packet loss. web pages take about 8-10 seconds to load.

Uploading to ntlwebspace and downloading from dowload.com together....this is where it gets bad !! downloading drops to 25-30Kb/s, uploading drops to about 16Kb/s, pings average about 150ms, webpages take about 20-40 seconds to load fully.

when p2p (azureus - bit torrent) is running, with download rate 40-80Kb/s, uploading at less than 15Kb/s, average ping is about 60ms, packet loss is 32%, and webpages take over 40 seconds to load , and occasionly the page doesn't load correctly (see attached)

Anyone else suffer from this, either on a samsung, pace, or SACM ? My PC aint the problem - CPU sits only runs at 1-30% through all this, and ample free memory. Is this the norm, or is it a problem, and am I likely to get fobbed off by tech support ?

Cheers
Kneebs is offline   Reply With Quote