View Single Post
Old 06-08-2004, 12:55   #161
TheBlueRaja
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bifta
41.7 with the same settings, that's on an Athlon XP 3200 at normal clock speed, generic slow cheap PC3200 and a Radeon 9800 pro also at normal clock speed.
Bifta - why have you got such a high score - im curious, the highest i can get is 37.1 with the tweaks mentioned earlier in this thread - yet your still about 5fps higher than me AND my memory is running at DDR 438 (whereas your is default).

There must be a difference here somewhere as i have a 9800 pro, 3200 (albeit a 2500+ OC'd to 3200) and Twin-X Dual DDR 3200 running at DDR 440.

Everything in the Graphics is at High Detail, no AA but with all the other options on, and my Ati Drivers (4.9) are at default settings too.

And thats running on the Nforce 2 NF7-s board which is regarded as one of the best Nforce 2 boards out there.

Yet the difference is quite high percentage wise, are you giving us the FIRST run score or the second as cacheing makes a big difference too?

Whats going on?
TheBlueRaja is offline   Reply With Quote