View Single Post
Old 05-08-2004, 22:19   #291
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Mum had sex with son

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Ok, let's have a quick summary here:

1) There are some people who think that incest is wrong, full stop, not even when it involves consenting adults and is not for procreation.

<snip>

Frankly I have no more interest in contributing to this thread because I enjoy having a reasonable debate but I'm not going to hang around to simply be abused for simply holding a "non-majority" viewpoint.

I think I would put myself in the first camp, the reason being that for those two consenting adults to get to that position it has probably resulted from an upbringing that indicated that such relationships were normal and acceptable, when in reality that is not the perception of the majority. I would also imagine that those involved had probably been in a relationship that was abusive to some degree, mental or physical, as someone has commented earlier, if the son can only show his love to his mother in a sexual physical manner then that relationship needs work.

If those involved had a healthy upbringing and decided that they really were the ones for each other then so be it, some DNA testing and they can procreate for all I care.

I guess where this is heading is that I think the current situation has arisen due to issues that social services and welfare should have picked up and managed a decade or so ago.

On the other unsnipped part of your post I would like to thank you for your reasoned and well constructed opposing viewpoint. Para 2 above would probably not have existed 290 posts ago, though this has run its course, especially if Jerrek, normally controversial, though not normally banning material has got there.
SMHarman is offline