Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
I was merely replying to a point you made about having children, so please don`t attempt to play the role of topic moderator when someone is responding to post you made.
Your point was what if the couple decide to have children as a result of incest. I am pointing out that many couples in a normal relationship actively decide not to have children, so I fail to see your point. Your original comment almost suggests that it is inevitable that if someone is in a relationship they are going to have children.
|
Quote:
|
That's a very narrow point of view.What if the couple decide to have children?Because that's what loving couples do is it not?
|
Who's playing semantics now?
I never made it an absolute did I?Also I was merely asking for you to stick to my point not acting as a moderator.
Not everyone will stick to the rules.They never do.It is realised that incest will happen.Under those conditions the authorities can either say get on with it(thereby risking the wrath of certain voters-probably the majority) or totally ban it.If you say well yes it's alright under certain conditions you just confuse and send conflicting signals to the populace.
Our government still stays on the side of a total ban.I don't see them revoking it because they must have a pretty good indication that it is what the majority want.I really can't see any government having a referendum on this issue though so I may be wrong.