Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul
Incest, wrong... even in Canada
|
taken from interpol:
children:
Quote:
s. 7(4.1) Sexual offences against children
The 1997 Criminal Code amendments make it possible for Canadian prosecution of Canadian citizens or permanent residents who sexually abuse children, including engaging in prostitution, while outside Canada. It is important to note that the amendments allow not only for the prosecution of offences related to child sex tourism, such as child prostitution, but also of child sexual exploitation offences, such as sexual exploitation, indecent acts, child pornography and incest.
|
in general:
Criminal proceeding may only be instituted with the consent of the provincial Attorney General. Such a decision will be taken following considerations of matter such as the extra-territorial element of the offence and the possible impact on relations between states.
*The offences listed in subsection 7(4.1) are:
s. 151 sexual interference;
s. 152 invitation to sexual touching;
s. 153 sexual exploitation;
s. 155 incest
http://www.interpol.int/Public/Child.../csaCanada.asp
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrek
What about brother/brother? Sister/sister?
|
it IS wrong. even if the law was changed that has no bearing to what i think.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrek
For all purposes then, consider a homosexual relationship where there is no chance of a baby. Your argument falls flat on its face then.
|
what has this got to do with the debate ?
a homosexual relationship has no relavence to this topic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrek
And, something that is sick to YOU may not be sick to someone else. I know of plenty of things YOU may find sick but I don't, and I'm positive that there are things YOU may find cool and I find sick.
|
we are not all robots.
its about what you think is right and wrong, and to me having sex with your own flesh and blood is categorically undeniably wrong.