Quote:
|
Originally Posted by punky
Let's just say Bush said it was a purely humanitarian issue. Would they still support the war? And if yes, how does it matter what Bush said, when the overall action, was good?
|
Whilst getting rid of Saddam might be classified as "an improvement", I'd hardly describe the current situation in Iraq as "good".
And if it being humanitarian is so good, why haven't the USA invaded the Sudan?