Cable Forum - View Single Post

punky · 03-08-2004, 19:45

It irritates me when interviewers like O'Reily et al. keep cutting the interviewee off mid sentence. If it was me, i'd probably end up smacking the guy.

Moore didn't really come off smelling of roses in that interview (I haven't seen the video yet, plugin issues, i'll sort it later). He seems to trot out the same old rhetoric whereas O'Reily is coming off the more sensible side.

What I would like to know is this: Whenever anyone says the war was right because Saddam was removed, people like Moore always say: "But they said it was about WMD". Let's just say Bush said it was a purely humanitarian issue. Would they still support the war? And if yes, how does it matter what Bush said, when the overall action, was good?

03-08-2004, 19:45	#41
punky Inactive Join Date: Jun 2003 Age: 45 Posts: 14,750	Re: Michael Moore caught lying again It irritates me when interviewers like O'Reily et al. keep cutting the interviewee off mid sentence. If it was me, i'd probably end up smacking the guy. Moore didn't really come off smelling of roses in that interview (I haven't seen the video yet, plugin issues, i'll sort it later). He seems to trot out the same old rhetoric whereas O'Reily is coming off the more sensible side. What I would like to know is this: Whenever anyone says the war was right because Saddam was removed, people like Moore always say: "But they said it was about WMD". Let's just say Bush said it was a purely humanitarian issue. Would they still support the war? And if yes, how does it matter what Bush said, when the overall action, was good?